
The current naming scheme still let think in persons or even roles. However, accountabilities should be independent of this. So …
Product Owner to Product Ownership
Scrum Master to Scrum Mastery
Developer to Development

This is a good idea @Mpe .

Thank you.
Additionally, I guess, it would be easier for teams to rotate accountabilities (e.g. for scrum mastery).

@mpe, that should be up to the team to decide

@Kunal S - I agree. Just wanted to say that it might be easier for teams to see that option. What I often hear is “who is our scrum master”, not “how do _we_ (want to) live the respective accountability”.

This would likely break the confusion between job title versus accountabiliyt and @Mpe suggestions a reasonable.